Pathology is in the midst of a profound transformation. Facing mounting workforce shortages and a growing demand for complex, quantitative biomarker assays, laboratories are increasingly turning to digital pathology and artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance efficiency and diagnostic precision.
Technology Networks spoke with Dr. Olga Colgan, strategic marketing director, and Dr. Joseph Chiweshe, MD, senior director of medical and scientific affairs at Leica Biosystems, to learn how AI-driven digital pathology is reshaping diagnostic workflows. Colgan and Chiweshe shared insights into how these tools are helping laboratories overcome staffing challenges, the practical and regulatory hurdles to adoption and what future innovations may redefine the role of pathologists.
Anna MacDonald (AM):
Senior Science Editor
Technology Networks
Anna is a senior science editor at Technology Networks. She holds a first-class honors degree in biological sciences from the University of East Anglia. Before joining Technology Networks she helped organize scientific conferences.
How can the adoption of AI-driven digital pathology tools address the recruitment deficit in pathology laboratories, and what impact is this having on workflow efficiency?
Olga Colgan, PhD (OC):
Strategic Marketing Director – Digital Pathology
Leica Biosystems
Olga Colgan, PhD, has nearly two decades of experience in the digital pathology sector and is focused on how this innovative technology can be leveraged to provide real benefits in both the healthcare and research domains.
As momentum around the adoption of digitized workflows and AI-driven technologies continues to grow, in the future, we anticipate all laboratories will ultimately leverage these tools to support routine reporting, standardize results and increase the accuracy of diagnoses.
By increasing the efficiency of workflows, AI-driven digital pathology can help pathology laboratories respond to the recruitment deficit. New technologies streamline workflows and support time-intensive activities, including triaging routine cases, identifying cancers, detecting rare events, interpreting biomarker assays and preparing draft reports.
AI-driven digital pathology tools enhance efficiency, reduce human error and provide more accurate and reproducible results. This is particularly important in tasks like biomarker expression analysis, which requires precise color and intensity interpretation. The human eye is excellent at pattern recognition but struggles with consistent color analysis, which can lead to error rates of up to 20% for certain tasks.
From a recruitment perspective, we’re seeing value as well. Digital pathology and AI are transforming the field into one that resonates better with the values of today’s young professionals: tech-forward, impactful, flexible and collaborative. By modernizing workflows and enabling innovation, these tools can help attract a new generation of pathologists who want to work at the cutting edge of science and healthcare.
AM:
Senior Science Editor
Technology Networks
Anna is a senior science editor at Technology Networks. She holds a first-class honors degree in biological sciences from the University of East Anglia. Before joining Technology Networks she helped organize scientific conferences.
What are the most significant challenges laboratories face when adopting AI-driven digital pathology systems, and how can these be addressed?
OC:
Strategic Marketing Director – Digital Pathology
Leica Biosystems
Olga Colgan, PhD, has nearly two decades of experience in the digital pathology sector and is focused on how this innovative technology can be leveraged to provide real benefits in both the healthcare and research domains.
Digital pathology adoption for routine clinical diagnostics globally is relatively low but growing quickly. The development of AI tools requires large datasets to train the AI models. As more laboratories adopt digital pathology, this creates a 'flywheel effect'; as more data becomes available, we create better AI tools. In turn, more laboratories are compelled to utilize digital pathology, which enhances workflow efficiency.
There is also a learning curve for pathologists transitioning to digital workflows. Navigating images on a screen differs from using a traditional microscope and some tissue features on digital slides can look slightly different to their physical counterparts. To allow pathologists time to acclimatize to new systems and ensure clinical safety, laboratories are typically taking a gradual approach to adoption, starting with specific subsets of slides or tests.
Another, sometimes overlooked, challenge laboratories face when adopting AI-driven digital pathology systems is the need to optimize their tissue processing workflows to ensure they produce 'digital-ready slides' that meet the needs of AI and digital systems. Collaboration between laboratories and companies with expertise in the entire diagnostic ecosystem is crucial.
AM:
Senior Science Editor
Technology Networks
Anna is a senior science editor at Technology Networks. She holds a first-class honors degree in biological sciences from the University of East Anglia. Before joining Technology Networks she helped organize scientific conferences.
As digital pathology systems become more advanced, what are the key regulatory and data privacy considerations that laboratories need to navigate?
Joseph Chiweshe, MD, MPH (JC):
Senior Director, Medical & Scientific Affairs
Leica Biosystems
Joseph Chiweshe, MD, MPH is senior director medical and scientific affairs at Leica Biosystems. With 15+ years of experience across the healthcare and medical device space, he is focused on active partnership with external stakeholders and communication of evidence for the medical and scientific community.
The advancement of digital pathology for computational and AI-driven enablement offers our health systems, providers and patients a lot of promise. With that comes significant consideration for the regulatory compliance approval and ethical use of AI-driven digital pathology systems.
For AI tools to be deployed in clinical practice, they must meet stringent regulatory standards that prove their safety, efficacy and reliability. This includes demonstrating that AI systems are unbiased and capable of delivering consistent and accurate results across diverse patient populations. Regulators often require rigorous validation studies to ensure that AI tools meet these standards, which can be resource-intensive for laboratories and developers. As these solutions grow, the FDA and other regulatory bodies continue to actively work to provide guidance to the many stakeholders of these AI-enabled advancements to ensure the utmost safety and effectiveness.
For laboratories, whether a test, device or diagnostic aid is approved by a regulatory body or not, both Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) and College of American Pathologists (CAP) require that it must be validated in the laboratory by the appropriate medical staff prior to being used as an assistive solution for clinical decision support.
Data privacy and security are equally important, as digital pathology systems and AI-enabled solutions need to safeguard protected health information and how it is used. Furthermore, with the rise in cybersecurity risk, considerations for robust risk management programs, personnel and governance will be needed.
AM:
Senior Science Editor
Technology Networks
Anna is a senior science editor at Technology Networks. She holds a first-class honors degree in biological sciences from the University of East Anglia. Before joining Technology Networks she helped organize scientific conferences.
How is the shift toward computational pathology transforming traditional testing workflows, particularly for assays that were previously outsourced to specialty laboratories?
OC:
Strategic Marketing Director – Digital Pathology
Leica Biosystems
Olga Colgan, PhD, has nearly two decades of experience in the digital pathology sector and is focused on how this innovative technology can be leveraged to provide real benefits in both the healthcare and research domains.
Computational pathology can enable laboratories to perform more complex analyses in-house, reducing the need for outsourcing to specialty laboratories. For example, tests that are currently sent to specialty laboratories can have a turnaround time of up to two weeks. In the future, they could be performed on digitized images in a matter of minutes – saving time and money.
As the utilization of digital pathology in routine diagnostics increases, AI-based tools can support the analysis of multiple biomarkers in a single tissue sample, providing deeper insights into disease mechanisms and enabling the development of more personalized treatment plans.
In the UK, the National Pathology Imaging Co-operative (NPIC), a collaboration between the NHS, industry and academia, has been established to deploy digital pathology in the NHS and develop AI to improve diagnosis. Already, the NPIC is demonstrating best practice by enabling remote access and digitizing all slides, resulting in increased efficiency, standardized diagnostic practices across a network and improved patient care.
AM:
Senior Science Editor
Technology Networks
Anna is a senior science editor at Technology Networks. She holds a first-class honors degree in biological sciences from the University of East Anglia. Before joining Technology Networks she helped organize scientific conferences.
Looking ahead, what advancements do you anticipate in digital pathology that could further revolutionize the diagnostic landscape?
JC:
Senior Director, Medical & Scientific Affairs
Leica Biosystems
Joseph Chiweshe, MD, MPH is senior director medical and scientific affairs at Leica Biosystems. With 15+ years of experience across the healthcare and medical device space, he is focused on active partnership with external stakeholders and communication of evidence for the medical and scientific community.
Looking to the future, several advancements in digital pathology are anticipated to further revolutionize the diagnostic landscape. One major development is the increasing integration of AI into diagnostic workflows. AI tools are expected to become more sophisticated and capable of handling complex tasks. Whether that is assisting in the analysis of multiplexed biomarkers, quantifying points of interest and/or data integration from vast sets across multiple sources all coming together to provide powerful tools for the care of those served.
As more laboratories embrace digital pathology, the availability of large datasets for AI training will increase, leading to the development of more advanced and reliable AI tools. These tools, in turn, will drive further adoption by offering new diagnostic capabilities and improving the efficiency of workflows. This cycle of growth and innovation will likely further the global use of digital pathology.
By analyzing complex biomarker profiles, digital and computational pathology systems play a central role in tailoring treatments to individual patients. This approach has immense potential to not only improve patient outcomes but also reduce healthcare costs by ensuring that treatments are more targeted and effective.
Finally, advancements in automation and data integration are expected to streamline diagnostic workflows further. Fully automated end-to-end systems, from tissue processing to diagnosis, could drastically reduce human intervention and error while enabling faster turnaround times.
As digital pathology becomes more prevalent, it has the ability to revolutionize global health and its reach. Notably, for those in more rural or resource-limited settings, they will be able to adopt these technologies at scale, democratizing access to advanced diagnostics and improving healthcare equity worldwide.
This content includes text that has been created with the assistance of generative AI and has undergone editorial review before publishing. Technology Networks' AI policy can be found here.